NECC 2008 Debrief …

So this year’s NECC was different than last years NECC. DUH! Of course – different location, different time, different issues, and you can’t go home again. It’s never how you remember.

Some complaints: WIFI not robust enough. Same complaint as last year. I’m not even an expert in this regard, but I have a feeling that providing great wifi at one concentrated location for over 10,000 people is always an issue. The pipe coming in (or maybe it’s the series of tubes?) is the final arbitrator of how good the connection is going to be. However feel free to explain how it could be done if you know a way, again I’m not an expert on the way the network works (or doesn’t) so fire away in comments with solutions. I’m just glad that I temporarily have a wifi card … it really came in handy, especially since my hotel wanted $9.95/day … and it gives me a connection in restaurants, airports, etc. But I wouldn’t have it if I was paying for it. $60/month is not acceptable at home … my time runs out in January.

Bloggers Café – Location poor, NECC Unplugged being there was an intrusion:
I must admit when I first plunked down at the Café Saturday I thought it was a good location. Big windows to the outside … internet was good (BC, Before Crowd). But as the conference unfolded the Café’s limitations were revealed. It was in the main thoroughfare of the conference (as opposed to last year where it was a bit off the beaten track) so attendees that were not necessarily bloggers saw tables, chairs, plug strips galore (they did get that right over last year) and would park themselves to make plans, wait for friends and check mail etc. This made it crowded. Last year the Café was bigger and expandable, so conversations could spread out and move about the Café. This is one of those situations where you’d really have to have seen that coming ahead of time … I’m not sure I would have noticed before the conference started that it might not be the best location. Lesson learned though. More space and a location a bit more peripheral would be better.

The other complication was that the Unconference was held there too. I can see why this seemed like a good idea at the time … and it might have worked well in Atlanta’s Café … could have been moved to one end or across the large hallway it was in. But being in this location made an already not great, crowded Café location worse.  The Unconference is probably a good idea … tweak it some and find a new place for it. If it could still be within shouting distance or so of the Blogger’s Café that would probably be good … they might go well together with some distance between them.

Closed sessions – There were crowded sessions last year, and even some that filled up and were closed. But not like this year. Some in attendance felt that there were fewer sessions overall and more attendees (maybe THAT’S why so many didn’t have their proposal for sessions accepted?) … more attendees and fewer sessions would explain the problem … I can’t say for sure that is true, but it could be. If so, have more sessions. Could the conference hall in San Antonio be smaller and not able to contain as many sessions? If so maybe Washington DC won’t have the same issues.

I know for me last year I wasn’t presenting or getting an award, both of which took time (probably the equivalent of a day or more) so I had a much richer experience last year as far as having time to talk and debrief AND BLOG as I learned. I was here with Lisa Parisi and Christine Southard who were co-winners of our award and who presented with me twice and I hardly got to talk to them about next years plans and tweaking our project. I had envisioned really having some great conversations with them (and I did) and I spent a lot of time with them, but never had time to have those conversations. I know that may sound strange, but we would usually be with a group or in a session or other discussion and … well … there went the time. I feel bad about the number of people I ran into that I wanted to talk to or told me they really had some questions for me, wanted to talk to me and it didn’t happen. But I also had some great conversations … maybe we should have a 4 day ed tech conference where we just talk … no rules, no pre-arranged topics, just let it happen and move around and be what it becomes.

It was still a great experience and a great time and I still learned tons. Despite a few issues I think in retrospect most would do it again (I’m sure a few would argue that point). I bet everyone had discussions or learned something here that would be very hard to give up having had. Each NECC (or any other conference) has it’s own personality. I’ve only been to 2 NECC’s, but I suspect that if you talked to veterans you would find that some years have been better than others … some probably especially memorable for some reason. It’s the whole chemistry of the place and time and people and more … it’s hard to find the exact right formula every time.

Learning is messy!

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags:

A “Telling” Moment At NECC

There is always discussion about how to spread the word about integrating educational technology and why it seems such a difficult task. I believe my experience on the shuttle bus this morning bringing me to the last day of NECC 2008 sums it up.

Two young couples having a conversation about something they saw at a session and wanted to find out more about on the net proclaimed the following:

“I can’t believe NONE OF US THOUGHT TO BRING OUR LAPTOPS TO THE CONFERENCE!” Others … “Yeah.”

WHAT!!!!?

Learning is messy!

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags:

ISTE Video/Audio Capture Policy At NECC 2008 – A Step Backwards, Or No Big Deal?

UPDATE: 6/20 – I’ve pasted the response from ISTE to Miguel’s post about this subject below. I commend ISTE for listening to members’ concerns and responding rapidly and responsibly.

Letter from Leslie Connery

Hi Miguel – We received substantial feedback about this issue and have had great internal conversations in the last 24 hours about how best to respond. We needed to listen to and address the valid concerns of ISTE members while also protecting the rights of the people who have agreed to present at NECC. The statement below addresses how we’d like to handle this for NECC2008.

Post NECC2008, we are planning to convene a discussion around the issue of broadcasting presentations and to work together collaboratively with podcasters, bloggers, presenters, and other stakeholders to develop guidelines for NECC2009 that meet the needs of the education community. ISTE recently disseminated a code of conduct regarding video and audio recordings at NECC 2008 which has generated some thoughtful and energetic discussion.

We welcome your interest and comments and would like to clarify and amend the code of conduct for NECC 2008. For NECC 2008, ISTE’s permission is not required for non-commercial video and audio recording of sessions and workshops.

However, for NECC 2008, written permission from the session or workshop presenter is required prior to capturing a video or audio recording. Any permitted recording should respect the presenter’s rights and not be disruptive.

Under no circumstances may any length or quality of video/audio capture be used for marketing, advertising, or commercial purposes without express written permission from both the session presenter(s) and ISTE. 

Thank you. We look forward to an ongoing dialog about fair use.

//Leslie

Original Post Below:

Twitter was abuzz this evening after Wes Fryer and then Miguel Guhlin posted about ISTE’s new (or maybe not new) policy regarding recording audio/video of presentations and events from NECC 2008 in San Antonio next week. The policy states that to record you must have the permission of the presenter (which is fine and just common courtesy) AND permission from ISTE … which may be a problem depending on how easy and timely it is to obtain.

Full video/audio capture of NECC sessions and activities is strictly prohibited without express written permission from BOTH: 1.) the session presenter/s, and 2.) ISTE. Those holding official ISTE-issued press credentials may capture footage for media coverage purposes only.    

Amateur video/audio capture is permitted of ambient environments, informal exchanges and sessions, and sessions and activities not organized by ISTE, etc., provided that appropriate permissions have been granted by the parties affected. ISTE assumes no liability for copyright and/or intellectual property violations that may occur as a result. Amateur video/audio capture is also permitted in NECC sessions and activities provided that the length of capture does not exceed 10 minutes AND appropriate permissions have been granted by the presenter/s.

Under no circumstances may any length or quality of video/audio capture of NECC sessions be used for marketing, advertising, or commercial purposes without express written permission from BOTH: 1.) the session presenter/s, and 2.) ISTE.

As always, if you have any questions pertaining to your presentation or the conference in general, please feel free to contact us: For sessions, neccprogram@iste.org; for workshops, neccworkshops@iste.org.

This may not have emerged as such an issue except that sharing the goings-on at NECC last year via Skype, and since then the advent of USTREAM and other sharing technologies and their use at conferences since have whetted the ed-tech worlds appetite (for good reason) for quickly having access to the learning and conversations – formal and informal – that come out of a conference like NECC.

The other disconnect here is that unfettered access to information and tools on the net is supposedly  one of the goals of ISTE … it’s definitely  a goal of every ed-tech proponent I know. So this does seem like a step backward. I suspect that no one made a decision not to attend NECC this year because others would Skype and Ustream sessions. However, it sure seems that the sharing that happened last year, mostly via Skype and podcasts, probably was an incentive to many to take the plunge and experience NECC live. If this was done because those in charge are afraid that sharing over the net will cut attendance I feel they made a huge mistake …  a bad call.

I have seen some commentary that perhaps this is about ISTE covering its behind against suits over copyrighted material and they put this out there to look tough, but will really just “not notice” what may go on otherwise.

Some have started email campaigns and other forms of protest, it will be interesting if ISTE comments anytime soon, before NECC 2008 commences.

Another example of messy learning!

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: