Learning Is Messy

“Messy” learning is:
Maybe not being sure where to start or how to start.
Trying and failing and trying again.
Frustration, focus, idea, arguing, agreeing,
experimenting, glue, paint, string, cardboard, scissors,
what else could we use? not quite, better, worse, adjust,
analyze, communicate, synthesize, mistakes, inquiry,
research, that won’t work… or maybe it will,
asking questions, getting answers,
What tools could we use? How can we find out? OUCH!
How can I help? How can we help? WHOOPS!
Let’s try this, How did you do that?
How will we show what we learned?
How much time is left? I can’t do this!
Can’t I work on this alone?
We did it!

What else makes learning messy?

Too Much Time For Change To Happen?

Bud the Teacher continued a conversation a few days ago about how it is taking “too much time” for tools like blogs to be embraced and utilized by educators. A seemingly unrelated favorite activity I re-visted today with my sixth graders motivated me to write this response:

Today my sixth graders played a writing game called “Write It” that I learned years ago from the Bay Area Writing Project. In this game students write notes to each other as a way of promoting writing as a communication tool – but they are not allowed to talk AT ALL. They must make a positive comment to the note recipient, ask them a question, deliver the note, and wait for a response – but they may not talk or they are out of the game.

So what?… Well as always I noted their focus and delight as they deciphered and replied to the comments and questions dropped off to them by their classmates – but I also watched as students that have language issues or aren’t sure how to spell another student’s name have to deal with that and figure out how to communicate with them without asking for help – or embarrassing themselves – in other words, they are left to their own devices.

A grinning, happy face suddenly becomes furrowed with concern as the student realizes they aren’t sure how to spell the sender’s name (even though it is written on the back of the note) or the exact wording they require to reply. They turn to ask a neighbor for help and… whoops!…I can’t talk. What will I do? You see students moving their lips … sounding out … looking for clues around the room… trying to envision words, phrases.

And it happens…communication happens! Students have been briefed before we start that they may see their name misspelled, they may have to problem solve to get meaning from some notes – and it happens. And it happens with a supportive, fun tone that fills the room as students grasp that they are communicating effectively. They self assess their language and communication shortcomings this way and when the game ends the debriefing spontaneously erupts as they inquire about the proper spelling of each others names, grammar mistakes (some unintentionally hilarious) and chicken-scratch handwriting examples.

Immediate, supportive, authentic audience – that‘s what leads to the magic. I am new to blogging – my students aren’t doing it yet – but they will – hopefully before this school year ends – and I see a similar potential for motivation, self -assessment and self-mediation.

Blogging isn’t new to most reading this post, but most teachers in tech presentations and inservice classes I teach have slim to no knowledge of what it is or why it might be valuable for their students.

Like many of you I have been completely discouraged by how slowly tech integration in general has been adopted and adapted by the education community. Note that tech equipment has quietly become pervasive, albeit excruciatingly under-utilized in schools, and so now access to tech isn’t as remote as it was – so as the education community in general wakes up and becomes motivated and encouraged to get started – the fact that they won’t be starting from scratch might jumpstart things a bit.

Learning is messy when it’s done well – and many are reluctant to get dirty until they remember and/or experience that the dirtier our students get the longer the dirt sticks and the harder it is to get rid of.

Almost Ever?

How would your child do in school,
If you didn’t or couldn’t help
with homework?
Almost ever?

If you didn’t or couldn’t provide
the pencils, paper, project boards
and trips to the library?
Almost ever?

How would your child do in school,
If you didn’t or couldn’t acquire
glue, fancy markers, a home computer
and the help to use them?
Almost ever?

If you didn’t or couldn’t make
Sure they’re not hang’n with
The wrong crowd?
Almost ever?

How would your child do in school,
If you didn’t or couldn’t admonish them
to get going on that project,
or make them do poor work over?
Almost ever?

If you didn’t or couldn’t help them
With that diorama or book report
or science fair project or making
that costume for the class play?
Almost ever?

How would your child do in school,
If you didn’t or couldn’t help when
That mean kid said really ugly,
hurtful things or punched or threatened
or laughed at your child?
Almost ever?

If since Kindergarten you were at work,
So you didn’t and couldn’t help them
get up and ready for school?
And they had to do it on their own,
including dressing appropriately,
and remembering lunch and school work,
and the permission slips?
Almost ever?

If YOU didn’t or couldn’t,
Could your child?
Or your child’s school?
Or your child’s teacher?
Almost ever?

There are those children you know,
Whose parents can’t or won’t,
How do those children do it?
Or their school do it?
Or their teacher do it?

Almost ever?

Why Field Trips, Technology and Project Based Learning?

hazenfossilhunt.jpg
Why Field Trips and technology and project based learning? They build schema and experience many of our students don’t have.

School mission statements have revolved around developing students that know how to learn or teach themselves for many years.

“Students will develop the skills required to become lifelong learners,” has become almost a mantra in education. Then we go about this by doing what we have been doing forever – just more focused, organized and, “research based.” NCLB added “the stick” because obviously what was missing was strict accountability.

Language and math “literacy” have become the focus because the thinking is that underachieving students will never make it without the “Basics” – OK, fair enough – and some of those programs have made a difference – especially in primary grade reading and math test scores. However, as soon as students get to 3rd or 4th grade those scores drop and continue to drop more each grade level thereafter.

Why? Partly because the programs being mandated are so time consuming that there is no time for anything else (field trips, real science, real social studies, art, technology, PE, etc.) where students might experience at least some of the vocabulary and background knowledge required to make sense of what they read – and make it interesting. When students hit upper elementary, reading and math questions stress more and more analytical skills and vocabulary and students often just don’t have the schema in those areas to be successful. Reading then is too often meaningless and boring.
Technology has become a new tool of literacy – like it or not. Just like long ago:

At a teacher’s conference in 1703, it was reported that
students could no longer prepare bark to calculate problems. They depended instead on expensive slates. What would students do when the slate was dropped and broken?

According to the Rural American Teacher in 1928,
students depended too much on store bought ink. They did not
know how to make their own. What would happen when they
ran out? They wouldn’t be able to write until their next trip to
the settlement.

We are not doing our students justice by not giving them experience with the new tools of literacy because we don’t feel they know the old ones well enough. Technology is a gateway to learning that without the knowledge of its use students will be at a disadvantage compared to those that do.
Don’t believe that yet? We will continue to convince you.