Online Safety Costs

Seeing that the Department of Education is hosting a cyber-bullying summit this week caused me to wonder aloud something that I and others have wondered before:

How much of the cyber-bullying and other online safety issues would be helped if schools were encouraged, empowered and supported in moving to a new pedagogy where technology was ubiquitous, and therefore made safe use and ethics lessons as prevalent from an early age as are traffic/crosswalk safety, scissor safety, playground safety, bus safety, stranger danger, swimming/water safety, chemistry/science class safety, various PE safety and more? How much money would be saved versus the cost of dealing with cyber-bullying and other online crime? Would that, coupled with not purchasing textbooks (or at least not as many) and other “programs” pay most of any added cost to ramping up technology purchases and professional development costs involved?

Oh, and maybe our children would be safer too.

Learning is messy!

Race To The Top “Winners” (2nd round) Announced – So Why Do I Feel Like We All Lost?

So the RttT 2nd round “winners were announced today and what bothered me about it the most I think, is that it shows that a very narrow-minded policy is going forward and the negative side of me sees only bad things for education. Not only because I disagree so vehemently with it’s narrow “one size fits all” approach, but that they have covered their tails by leaving it open to states to try other ways if they want, knowing that that isn’t going to happen for a whole bunch of reasons.

What bothers me more is that they/we are spending lots of money, and so when things don’t go well, or as well as they could have, (DANG! – we could have REALLY innovated and REALLY tried many diverse ways to change education for the good) but instead we will hear how AGAIN tons of money was spent and education is still poor and there won’t be the stomach for NOW funding truly innovative approaches that we could have learned from what worked, what didn’t, maybe that what works for some students in some locations doesn’t work for others in other locations … but we would have found out, or at least found out more than we know now … and that chance has been piddled away for maybe another 20 years (although I hope not).

I’m also left to wonder why not really demand many approaches? This education thing is supposedly a huge issue and problem. Why is there this very stubborn denial of trying any other pedagogical approach other than charter schools? I hate to say it, but it makes me suspicious that someone has the fix in to make this NOT work. (yes I’ve heard all that before and who it might be and why, end public schools, the billionaires boys club has become the education department because they are education experts somehow just because they are rich, it’s elitism at work, and so on) I guess I was hoping for more from our leaders and I’m frankly very disappointed and disillusioned about it today.

Will have to kick myself in the tail and put this behind me though and come up with a way to make hay. Have to believe it will have to be “messy learning” at its best!

Learning is messy!

Is There A Change of Heart Brewing About Race To The Top?

I have long questioned why a policy like Race To The Top that is supposed to be about promoting innovation in education, has had such a narrow focus on charter schools, relying on standardized test scores to evaluate teachers, as well as assuming that teachers are 95% of the problem in our schools (health, poverty, language, parental involvement and other issues somehow get a pass). Of course we should be rooting out poor teachers, but just doing that won’t “fix” our schools, and using test scores to decide that is fraught with peril. And certainly RttT has some good pieces too.

I have had several conversations with folks in the US Education Department about how they are promoting the “innovation” that RttT would promote, when clearly it stifles innovation unless you plan to “innovate” within the KIPP (or similar) model of charter school approach that narrows the curriculum. They have claimed that they just haven’t gotten much negative feedback about any of this. Well it appears that has started to change.
Recently the Washington DC schools’ test scores have been brought into question. Michelle Rhee, who is the poster child for “accountability” and using test scores to evaluate teachers, and is the chancellor of DC’s schools and the current scores are not all good news for her. See this column: Rhee’s Problem With D.C.’s New Test Scores.
Jay Matthews, who writes “Class Struggle” and has long been a proponent of test scores, charter schools and RttT, has had at least a small change of heart. He starts out a recent column saying:
“I have to question my own judgment and fairmindedness when I ignore–for three years!– a report that raises important questions about the way we have been using test scores to rate schools.”
There are more chinks appearing recently as well. The NAACP has released a scathing rebuttal to some of RttT’s policies.
The upshot is how could this effect support for the pedagogical changes we have discussed? If RttT broadens to accept and fund many approaches so we can find the strengths and weaknesses of each to really improve education and learning, how might that change how you/we “do school”? What are the “could be’s”?
Learning is messy

Embed of My TEDx Talk

You’ll have to pardon me here. I originally meant to embed this video in my last post, but at the time I was at the airport and couldn’t make it work, so here is my TEDxDenver ED presentation embeded … unless of course it doesn’t work … again. I would have just replaced my last post, but there were a few comments and I didn’t want to just delete them. Now I have learned how to embed video in my blog … which for some reason I had never done before. So, learning really is messy:

My Tedx Denver ED Presentation Video

UPDATE 2 (7/15/2010)- OK, the video is back up sans my intro because my mic had an issue at first and the sound wasn’t great, so they edited that part out… not a big loss. I showed a slide of a classroom from 100 years ago and mentioned how Rttt (without naming it) was more a return to that era, like we just never got that 100 year old pedagogy down right and if we do so now that will fix the schools.

UPDATE1: I’ve been informed that they have temporarily taken down the video for more editing. It was posted by mistake before they were done. I will put a new link up when it returns. : )

Learning is messy!!

Well I tried to embed the video here, but I can’t get it to work from here at the airport, so instead I’m just putting the link here instead:

TEDxDenverEd- BrianCrosby- Back to the Future?


First Images and Report About TEDxDenver ED

brian-crosby-1-tedxdenvered

As each presenter shared onstage Janine Underhill made a “Graphic Representation” of what they were saying, doing and showing on an ENO interactive whiteboard. I was jumping around pretty quickly so I am amazed by just how she kept up with me. Thanks Janine! Above is the representation she drew during my talk. There are several others and a few photos from the night also posted on the TEDxDenver ED website with more to come.

When they are done editing they will also post the videos of each presentation.

Learning is messy!

TEDxDenver ED Presentation links

I’ve had numerous requests for links to the student work highlighted during my TEDx Denver ED talk tonight. Just about everything is linked to right here on this blog. Just look at the top of the right hand column under “Pages” and you will see “Links To My Students’ work.”

Presenting my talk was a fantastic experience that I will blog more about later. I do need to say thank you to all of you … my presentation was a reflection of the work those of you that are part of this expanding network of learners help me and my students with everyday.

Learning is messy!

TEDxDenverED Presentation

I’ve been known to advocate … pontificate? …  for teachers having more voice in general. Well now I’m being asked to do just that … the advocate part that is. I’ll be presenting a TED Talk at TEDxDenverED, on Monday, June 28, 2010, 5:30 – 10:00 PM (includes catered reception)

Ricketson Theatre

Denver Performing Arts Center

(Adjacent to Convention Ctr)
1101 13th Street
Denver, Colorado

The other presenters are listed here.

From the TEDxDenverED web site: TEDxDenverED is centered around the theme of transforming education by empowering people.

A diverse group of educators, innovators and problem-solvers in attendance will have the opportunity to learn from one another, both as speakers and as attendees, and will leave the conference driven to creatively improve our collective future.

I understand the presentations are being streamed live, but I don’t know the particulars yet. School gets out for us the end of this week, then I will go into total prep mode – I’m really stoked … and nervous … but a good nervous I hope,  about sending a powerful message. Hope to see you there.

Learning is messy!

Update: Our High Hopes High Altitude Balloon Project

Thursday we launched our balloon. It reached an altitude of over 107,800 feet, the flight lasted about 90 minutes, the coldest temperature encountered was -80F, our camera took almost 500 pictures.

My 4th grade students have each already posted on their blogs, pieces that share a bit about the launch and a “Wordless Photo Essay” about the day. We are still working on stories where each student has to tell the story of the flight from the point of view of the balloon. They will be able to illustrate their stories with photos we have already posted on our class Flickr page (check them out – way cool – especially these taken by our class onboard camera). We hope to make multi-media presentations that combine the story from preparation through recovery using iPhoto, iMovie and Garage Band.

One of the photos taken at over 100,000 feet on the way down.

On the science side, we are learning how to edit Wiki pages while making a supporting page for the project – The High Hopes High Altitude Balloon Project wiki will have pages that share links to the science behind the project as well as links to the Flickr photos, blogs, videos and multi-media projects we are producing. Note the link on the main page to a map that shows the path, time, altitude and more of the flight. If you click on the red dots they display the statistics for that point in the trip – we were able to follow the journey live using the map.

One of the highlights of the project was developing and sharing our “High Hopes” for our school, community and the world. The students all wrote their own. We took a photo of each student against a sky background and using FD’s Flickr Toys each student made what we called a “StratoCard” (because the balloon would make it into the stratosphere) and we sent these up with the balloon as a keepsake. In addition the students used their blogs to solicit “High Hopes” from around the world. We burned these to a CD and sent the world’s high hopes aloft as well. We received “Hopes” from England, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and across the US. Perhaps the most poignant however, were the “Hopes” we received from Bangkok, Thailand, where rioting and violence have been issues of  late. Students there shared their hopes that people would stop starting fires, stop releasing pets into the streets as they flee, and in general promote peace.

I just wish we had more than 6 days of school left – there is so much we could do with all these experiences and I haven’t even mentioned the temperature and other data we collected. And on that note I should mention that The UNR scientists that ran the project from their end, Dr. Jeffrey C. LaCombe, Associate Professor, Chemical & Metallurgical Engineering and Dr. Eric L. Wang, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering – want to do this again next school year! I have “High Hopes” that we will!

Learning is messy!

Update: Our “High Hopes” High Altitude Balloon Project

Travis Fields, a graduate student in mechanical engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, and the scientist leading our high altitude balloon project visited our school today to talk to our 4th graders.  He explained some of the science that they work on. Things like they are required (yes required) in some classes to design high tech dune buggies, race cars and more (see photo) They are graded on their design, explanation on why it will work and then construction and testing.

vehicles
Very few of our students have family members that have attended college, so this was a great opportunity for them to see the possibilities. Many were confused at first that you could actually take classes in this kind of thing … priceless!
Next Travis showed them a video clip they made exploding a balloon containing hydrogen gas … we had to watch it twice. They are filling our balloon with hydrogen because it is much cheaper than helium … helium has to be mined and the deposits are running out, so the price has skyrocketed.
He explained that the research they are doing with balloons is mainly about stabilizing the payloads during flight so that certain kinds of data and samples can be obtained without the constant movement that happens now. Balloon flight is very cheap … no, very, very cheap compared to rockets, so figuring out how to do this would be huge.
He also informed us that they have decided to use a 3,000 gram balloon instead of the 1200, so that means we were wrong when we claimed that the balloon would get at least 80,000 feet. Now it should make 100,000 feet+. They are trying out a new balloon release system during our flight that will … well … release the balloon after it bursts and the parachute deploys so that it isn’t hanging below the parachute flopping and banging into the payloads and causing havoc.

He showed how we will track the balloon online during it’s flight and explained that sometimes it takes 6 hours or more to find the balloon after it’s 2 hour flight – about 90 minutes up and 30 minutes down. He checked out our payload design and said it was basically sound … gave us a few tips on attaching a back-up line in case something happens to our rigging.

If you are interested we are still taking “High Hopes” comments to send up with the balloon … now even higher.
Learning is messy!