The LA Test Score Debacle

– This post is actually a comment I left on the “Taking Note” blog. The author, John Merrow wrote about his support of the LA Times plan to publish student test scores as a way to “out” teachers:

Face it. They did this story because it was mostly easy to do … the data was already there, there are always people available to interpret the data and draw conclusions, and the conclusions drawn had shock value, made great headlines, and drew national and probably international attention. Most people don’t understand test results, issues schools deal with, the difficulties with evaluating “good teaching,” and more. Our journalists and press have abandoned us – they do what is easy and shocking because it is cost effective and won’t ruffle too many feathers. Let’s do some deep stories on the other issues that hold back students, teachers, administrators, schools and education in general. What are the other big issues? How about all these large textbook companies that continually promise huge test score gains if their series is purchased for millions of dollars. Are they part of the problem? Is societies reluctance to change a model of school that is over a century old because change is hard part of the problem?

We have decided that education issues are easy when they are not. So instead of investing in finding the best answers we can, we rely on assessments that everyone agrees are poor at best (but they’re what we have), and because dealing with issues like poverty, indifference, language, teacher effectiveness and more are hard, very hard, we develop an education plan that attempts to step around them. President Kennedy, when he spoke about going to the Moon, talked about doing so because it was hard. Look what breakthroughs came from the work and research that went into that endeavor – in computer science, science in general, nutrition, health, materials and so much more. We have the money … those billions of dollars that are earmarked for a very flawed and narrow RTTT.

Let’s re-purpose some of that money to do the R&D necessary to REALLY make a difference. Let’s fund many approaches instead of mainly KIPP clones when no one associated with KIPP will send their own kids to the schools they advocate. What breakthroughs in pedagogy, health, psychology, family/parent involvement, art, math, reading, science and so much more will we discover? They would be exciting times that just might rival the space race. What implications might that have for the rest of the world too?

Do we need to find and deal with the poor teachers in our ranks? Yes! Do we need to make our schools the best they can be for now and our future instead of just making another tweak of a 100 year old + model for schools that we hang onto because it is what we know and change is hard? Hell yes! So let’s do that instead of wasting time on bandaid, easy approaches.

Learning is messy!

Online Safety Costs

Seeing that the Department of Education is hosting a cyber-bullying summit this week caused me to wonder aloud something that I and others have wondered before:

How much of the cyber-bullying and other online safety issues would be helped if schools were encouraged, empowered and supported in moving to a new pedagogy where technology was ubiquitous, and therefore made safe use and ethics lessons as prevalent from an early age as are traffic/crosswalk safety, scissor safety, playground safety, bus safety, stranger danger, swimming/water safety, chemistry/science class safety, various PE safety and more? How much money would be saved versus the cost of dealing with cyber-bullying and other online crime? Would that, coupled with not purchasing textbooks (or at least not as many) and other “programs” pay most of any added cost to ramping up technology purchases and professional development costs involved?

Oh, and maybe our children would be safer too.

Learning is messy!

Race To The Top “Winners” (2nd round) Announced – So Why Do I Feel Like We All Lost?

So the RttT 2nd round “winners were announced today and what bothered me about it the most I think, is that it shows that a very narrow-minded policy is going forward and the negative side of me sees only bad things for education. Not only because I disagree so vehemently with it’s narrow “one size fits all” approach, but that they have covered their tails by leaving it open to states to try other ways if they want, knowing that that isn’t going to happen for a whole bunch of reasons.

What bothers me more is that they/we are spending lots of money, and so when things don’t go well, or as well as they could have, (DANG! – we could have REALLY innovated and REALLY tried many diverse ways to change education for the good) but instead we will hear how AGAIN tons of money was spent and education is still poor and there won’t be the stomach for NOW funding truly innovative approaches that we could have learned from what worked, what didn’t, maybe that what works for some students in some locations doesn’t work for others in other locations … but we would have found out, or at least found out more than we know now … and that chance has been piddled away for maybe another 20 years (although I hope not).

I’m also left to wonder why not really demand many approaches? This education thing is supposedly a huge issue and problem. Why is there this very stubborn denial of trying any other pedagogical approach other than charter schools? I hate to say it, but it makes me suspicious that someone has the fix in to make this NOT work. (yes I’ve heard all that before and who it might be and why, end public schools, the billionaires boys club has become the education department because they are education experts somehow just because they are rich, it’s elitism at work, and so on) I guess I was hoping for more from our leaders and I’m frankly very disappointed and disillusioned about it today.

Will have to kick myself in the tail and put this behind me though and come up with a way to make hay. Have to believe it will have to be “messy learning” at its best!

Learning is messy!

Is There A Change of Heart Brewing About Race To The Top?

I have long questioned why a policy like Race To The Top that is supposed to be about promoting innovation in education, has had such a narrow focus on charter schools, relying on standardized test scores to evaluate teachers, as well as assuming that teachers are 95% of the problem in our schools (health, poverty, language, parental involvement and other issues somehow get a pass). Of course we should be rooting out poor teachers, but just doing that won’t “fix” our schools, and using test scores to decide that is fraught with peril. And certainly RttT has some good pieces too.

I have had several conversations with folks in the US Education Department about how they are promoting the “innovation” that RttT would promote, when clearly it stifles innovation unless you plan to “innovate” within the KIPP (or similar) model of charter school approach that narrows the curriculum. They have claimed that they just haven’t gotten much negative feedback about any of this. Well it appears that has started to change.
Recently the Washington DC schools’ test scores have been brought into question. Michelle Rhee, who is the poster child for “accountability” and using test scores to evaluate teachers, and is the chancellor of DC’s schools and the current scores are not all good news for her. See this column: Rhee’s Problem With D.C.’s New Test Scores.
Jay Matthews, who writes “Class Struggle” and has long been a proponent of test scores, charter schools and RttT, has had at least a small change of heart. He starts out a recent column saying:
“I have to question my own judgment and fairmindedness when I ignore–for three years!– a report that raises important questions about the way we have been using test scores to rate schools.”
There are more chinks appearing recently as well. The NAACP has released a scathing rebuttal to some of RttT’s policies.
The upshot is how could this effect support for the pedagogical changes we have discussed? If RttT broadens to accept and fund many approaches so we can find the strengths and weaknesses of each to really improve education and learning, how might that change how you/we “do school”? What are the “could be’s”?
Learning is messy

Playing With a New Theme

Update 7/24/2010 – fixed header so it doesn’t double post the blog’s title – new header to come soon I hope!

If you are a regular to this blog you will note some changes here. I have wanted to change the look and workings of this blog for quite awhile, but time and knowledge have always held me back. I am not a real techie type, I don’t know php programming and as you can see I’m struggling a bit with getting my header to work like I want it to.

I am having my artistic daughter help me design a new image for my header, so things will continue to shift and adjust for a bit. I thought it fitting to leave it like this though so you can share in my “messy” redesign.

Learning is messy!

Embed of My TEDx Talk

You’ll have to pardon me here. I originally meant to embed this video in my last post, but at the time I was at the airport and couldn’t make it work, so here is my TEDxDenver ED presentation embeded … unless of course it doesn’t work … again. I would have just replaced my last post, but there were a few comments and I didn’t want to just delete them. Now I have learned how to embed video in my blog … which for some reason I had never done before. So, learning really is messy:

My Tedx Denver ED Presentation Video

UPDATE 2 (7/15/2010)- OK, the video is back up sans my intro because my mic had an issue at first and the sound wasn’t great, so they edited that part out… not a big loss. I showed a slide of a classroom from 100 years ago and mentioned how Rttt (without naming it) was more a return to that era, like we just never got that 100 year old pedagogy down right and if we do so now that will fix the schools.

UPDATE1: I’ve been informed that they have temporarily taken down the video for more editing. It was posted by mistake before they were done. I will put a new link up when it returns. : )

Learning is messy!!

Well I tried to embed the video here, but I can’t get it to work from here at the airport, so instead I’m just putting the link here instead:

TEDxDenverEd- BrianCrosby- Back to the Future?


First Images and Report About TEDxDenver ED

brian-crosby-1-tedxdenvered

As each presenter shared onstage Janine Underhill made a “Graphic Representation” of what they were saying, doing and showing on an ENO interactive whiteboard. I was jumping around pretty quickly so I am amazed by just how she kept up with me. Thanks Janine! Above is the representation she drew during my talk. There are several others and a few photos from the night also posted on the TEDxDenver ED website with more to come.

When they are done editing they will also post the videos of each presentation.

Learning is messy!

TEDxDenver ED Presentation links

I’ve had numerous requests for links to the student work highlighted during my TEDx Denver ED talk tonight. Just about everything is linked to right here on this blog. Just look at the top of the right hand column under “Pages” and you will see “Links To My Students’ work.”

Presenting my talk was a fantastic experience that I will blog more about later. I do need to say thank you to all of you … my presentation was a reflection of the work those of you that are part of this expanding network of learners help me and my students with everyday.

Learning is messy!

TEDxDenverED Presentation

I’ve been known to advocate … pontificate? …  for teachers having more voice in general. Well now I’m being asked to do just that … the advocate part that is. I’ll be presenting a TED Talk at TEDxDenverED, on Monday, June 28, 2010, 5:30 – 10:00 PM (includes catered reception)

Ricketson Theatre

Denver Performing Arts Center

(Adjacent to Convention Ctr)
1101 13th Street
Denver, Colorado

The other presenters are listed here.

From the TEDxDenverED web site: TEDxDenverED is centered around the theme of transforming education by empowering people.

A diverse group of educators, innovators and problem-solvers in attendance will have the opportunity to learn from one another, both as speakers and as attendees, and will leave the conference driven to creatively improve our collective future.

I understand the presentations are being streamed live, but I don’t know the particulars yet. School gets out for us the end of this week, then I will go into total prep mode – I’m really stoked … and nervous … but a good nervous I hope,  about sending a powerful message. Hope to see you there.

Learning is messy!